Skip to main content

Methodology

How precise are our recipes?

For every product we have a DIY recipe for, our build matches the brand's formulation spec-by-spec — carbs, glucose-fructose ratio, sodium, and (for drinks) powder weight per serving. The table below is generated live from the same engine that powers the Builder, so the precision claim is checkable against the shipping code, not a static screenshot.

Drinks — spec-by-spec match

Each row compares the brand's published label to the recipe the engine generates when asked to replicate that product. Carbs, ratio, sodium, and powder weight should be visually identical — that is the precision claim, made testable.

ProductCarbs (label / DIY)Ratio (label / DIY)Sodium (label / DIY)Powder wt (label / DIY)
Science in Sport
Beta Fuel Powder
80 g
80 g
match
1:0.8
1:0.8
match
460 mg
460 mg
match
82 g
84.1 g
Maurten
Drink Mix 320
80 g
80 g
match
1:0.8
1:0.8
match
200 mg
200 mg
match
80 g
82.8 g
Tailwind Nutrition
Endurance Fuel
25 g
25 g
match
2:1
2:1
match
310 mg
310 mg
match
27 g
28.1 g
Skratch Labs
Sport Hydration Drink Mix
20 g
20 g
match
2:1
2:1
match
380 mg
380 mg
match
22 g
22.1 g

Gels — spec-by-spec match

Same comparison for gels. Powder weight is omitted because the commercial serving size includes the gel's suspending fluid (water, glycerin, thickeners) which the engine doesn't model — the chemistry of the carb load is what governs absorption.

ProductCarbs (label / DIY)Ratio (label / DIY)Sodium (label / DIY)
GU Energy
Roctane Energy Gel
25 g
25 g
match
2:1
2:1
match
125 mg
126 mg
Precision Fuel & Hydration
PF 30 Gel
30 g
30 g
match
2:1
2:1
match
0 mg
0 mg
match
Neversecond
C30 Energy Gel
30 g
30 g
match
2:1
2:1
match
200 mg
200 mg
match

How we know their formulas

The precision claim above only holds if our reference numbers are right. Each spec we use sits at one of five confidence tiers — laid out below, then applied product-by-product, with the two known approximations called out at the end.

The precision hierarchy

TierSourceUsed for
Tier 1Exact (FDA-required nutrition label)Total carbs and total sodium — every product, every row of the precision table above.
Tier 2Brand-publishedCarb ratio for products that disclose it (Maurten, SiS, Skratch, Neversecond, Precision, GU). Sodium source for products listing a single salt in the ingredient list.
Tier 3Computed from disclosed compositionCarb ratio when the brand prints ingredient percentages on the label (e.g., SiS's “Maltodextrin 57%, Fructose 42%”), or when the listed carb sources plus the total carb count make the ratio derivable from chemistry (e.g., Tailwind's dextrose + sucrose at 25 g total). Used as a cross-check when tier-2 also exists, or as primary when it doesn't.
Tier 4Inferred from ingredient orderFDA-style labels list ingredients in descending mass order, so it's possible to bound a ratio when neither tier 2 nor tier 3 is available. We avoid this category — no featured product currently relies on it.
Tier 5Documented heuristicSodium-source gram split when an ingredient list contains both NaCl and sodium citrate (engine uses a fixed 60/40 citrate/NaCl default). Trace-ingredient simplifications (e.g., a product using mostly citrate plus a small amount of sea salt is treated as pure citrate). See the two approximations below.

Per-product source breakdown

Total carbs and total sodium are tier 1 for every product (label-exact), so they aren't repeated below. Each card lists the tier behind the two specs that vary in confidence: carb ratio and sodium source split.

Science in Sport Beta Fuel Powder

Full teardown →
Carb ratio
Tier 2Brand-published 1:0.8; the label-stated 57% maltodextrin / 42% fructose split independently confirms it (tier 3 cross-check).
Sodium source
Tier 1Negligible sodium (4 mg) — no source ambiguity to resolve.

Maurten Drink Mix 320

Full teardown →
Carb ratio
Tier 2Brand-published 1:0.8.
Sodium source
Tier 2Sodium chloride only, per ingredient list.

Caveat: Alginate-pectin hydrogel matrix not replicated.

Tailwind Nutrition Endurance Fuel

Full teardown →
Carb ratio
Tier 3Computed from the published carb sources (sucrose + dextrose). Sucrose is 1:1 by chemistry; dextrose is 100% glucose; the proportions yield the stated 2:1 at 25 g total carbs.
Sodium source
Tier 5Treated as pure sodium citrate. The trace sea salt in the ingredient list is small and the gram split isn't disclosed — see approximation #2 below.

Skratch Labs Sport Hydration Drink Mix

Full teardown →
Carb ratio
Tier 2Brand-published 1:1 (cane sugar contributes 1:1 directly; the small dextrose addition nudges glucose slightly higher, but the published ratio rounds to 1:1).
Sodium source
Tier 5Both sodium chloride and sodium citrate appear in the ingredient list; the gram split isn't disclosed. Engine uses the 60/40 citrate/NaCl default — see approximation #1 below.

GU Energy Roctane Energy Gel

Full teardown →
Carb ratio
Tier 2Brand-published 2:1 (the GU default across the line).
Sodium source
Tier 2Sodium chloride only, per ingredient list.

Caveat: 1.4 g free-form amino-acid blend (BCAAs, histidine, taurine) not replicated.

Precision Fuel & Hydration PF 30 Gel

Full teardown →
Carb ratio
Tier 2Brand-published 2:1 maltodextrin + fructose.
Sodium source
Tier 1Zero sodium by design — Precision decouples electrolytes into separate tabs.

Neversecond C30 Energy Gel

Full teardown →
Carb ratio
Tier 2Brand-published 2:1 (co-founded by Asker Jeukendrup, the dose-rate framework's author; formula is openly published).
Sodium source
Tier 2Sodium citrate only, per ingredient list.

The two approximations we make

1. The 60/40 sodium-source blend default

When a product's ingredient list contains both sodium chloride and sodium citrate (Skratch Sport, for example), the brand almost never publishes the gram split between them. The engine uses a fixed 60% sodium citrate / 40% NaCl default, defined in src/lib/engine/recipes.ts under the addSodiumIngredients “blend” case. Total sodium milligrams match the label exactly because we back-solve from the label number; the gram split between the two salt powders is the part we can't verify. The actual brand could be 80/20, 50/50, or anything in between — the physiology is identical (sodium is sodium), only taste and trace mineral profile differ.

2. Trace-ingredient curation simplifications

A handful of products list a primary salt plus a small amount of a secondary salt — e.g., Tailwind's ingredient list reads “sodium citrate, sea salt” with the sea salt small enough to be incidental. We curate these as single-salt sources in the product database to avoid invoking the 60/40 heuristic when the brand is effectively single-source. The total sodium dose stays label-exact; the engine just doesn't add the few hundredths of a gram of NaCl that the brand probably uses for trace mineral or flavor reasons.

Worked example: DIY SiS Beta Fuel

The table above gives you the answer per product. This section shows the arithmetic for one of them, end to end, so you can verify the precision by hand. SiS Beta Fuel is the cleanest example because every step is checkable against a sachet on the shelf.

Inputs

  • Target carbs: 80 g per serving
  • Glucose : fructose ratio: 1 : 0.8
  • Mix type: drink, 500 ml water
  • Sodium: 4 mg (matching the SiS label — layer electrolytes separately)
1

Split 80 g of carbs by ratio

ratioTotal     = 1 + 0.8 = 1.8
glucoseCarbs   = 80 × (1   / 1.8) = 44.4 g
fructoseCarbs  = 80 × (0.8 / 1.8) = 35.6 g

SiS’s own label declares 44 g glucose-source carbs and 36 g fructose. Same arithmetic, same answer.

2

Convert glucose target to maltodextrin grams

maltodextrinGrams = glucoseCarbs / carbPct
                  = 44.4 / 0.95
                  = 46.7 g

Maltodextrin is 95% carbohydrate by weight (the rest is moisture and ash) — you need slightly more powder than the carb target.

3

Convert fructose target to fructose grams

fructoseGrams = fructoseCarbs / 1.00 = 35.6 g

Fructose powder is 100% carbs — what you weigh is what you absorb.

4

Sum the powder weight

dryWeight = 46.7 + 35.6 + (negligible salt) ≈ 82.3 g

The SiS sachet weighs 82 g. Our recipe weighs 82.3 g. That delta is the maltodextrin moisture content rounding through the math — functionally a match to the gram.

5

Compute the in-bottle concentration

concentration = totalCarbs / (dryWeight + volumeMl) × 100
              = 80 / (82.3 + 500) × 100
              = 13.7%

13.7% is well above the 8% gastric-emptying threshold. SiS Beta Fuel is deliberately a high-energy drink that trades gastric comfort for fuel density — our DIY replica inherits that exact tradeoff. To dilute, mix in 750 ml (≈ 9.6%) or 1000 ml (≈ 7.4%).

Final recipe

46.7 g maltodextrin + 35.6 g fructose in 500 ml of water. Total powder weight 82 g, identical to the sachet. Same ratio, same concentration, same osmolality, same transporter loading. The arithmetic is the formulation.

For the live cost comparison and ingredient sourcing on this exact recipe, see /diy/sis-beta-fuel.

What we don't claim equivalence on

Three things our recipes deliberately do not match. Calling them out is what makes the precision claim above credible.

Hydrogel matrix and other proprietary processing

Maurten's alginate-pectin hydrogel and any brand-specific gel suspension or encapsulation chemistry isn't modeled. The carb load and ratio are identical; the physical format is not. (For what it's worth, the independent matched-dose literature reviewed in Podlogar & Wallis 2022 has not reliably reproduced a hydrogel performance benefit — see /diy/maurten-320.)

Proprietary additives outside the carb + electrolyte profile

Free-form amino-acid blends (GU Roctane's 1.4 g BCAA / histidine / taurine), proprietary flavor systems, and brand-specific sweetener stacks. The chemistry of the fuel matches; everything that lives outside the fuel doesn't.

Your individual sweat rate and gut tolerance

Our sodium defaults are environment-based population midpoints; your actual sweat sodium can be 2–5× higher or lower. The 60 g/hr SGLT1 and 45 g/hr GLUT5 transporter ceilings are population values; trained guts handle more, new guts handle less. Override sodium in the Builder; gut-train carbs over weeks before racing. Math equivalence is not gut equivalence — nothing new on race day, even a DIY mix that's mathematically identical to your usual.

Build a mix using the same engine

Every recipe in the table above is what the Builder produces by default. Open it to replicate any of them — or design your own.